确实如此:梅拉尼娅·特朗普在这次总统选举中扮演了一个有点轻松的目标,在她的RNC演讲中扼杀了米歇尔·奥巴马,并对人民和他们的过程表现出了冷漠态度。但现在,在充满希望的第一夫人向两家媒体提起诽谤诉讼之后,由于似乎没有证据证明她过去曾参与护送服务,我们 – 共和党人 和 一个民主党人 – 不能帮助她来防守。
看,在所有政治途径中的女性,无论她们是在跑步,在办公室,还是政治配偶,仍然受到对其外表或精神状态毫无根据的批评 – 仅仅因为她们是女性。贬损性地提到了他们的性过去讨论,即男性政治家,甚至男性政治配偶,从未遇到过 – 猖獗。好老式的荡妇羞辱还活着,特朗普夫人 也 虽然她是一个声誉良好的模特,但仍要接受过去裸体造型照片的审查。
但是,虽然我们以特朗普夫人的话来说这些指控是错误的,但它引出了一个更大的问题:为什么会这样 仍然 挑战强大女性的首选战略?为什么我们如何让女性失望?在我们批评他们的想法,策略或平台之前,为什么我们要对他们的乌鸦脚或性史进行批判?我们在国家聚光灯下以及其他方面看到女性的方式必须改变。
这不是民主党或共和党的问题。在过道的两侧,我们总是更努力,更快,更长,在我们的职业生涯中没有抱怨,被视为与我们的男性同行平等。但是我们也听到了我们背后的侮辱 – 我们被称为“粗暴”或者有“尖锐的肘部”来完成工作。但是,这是一个男人最后一次被称为“激进”或“情绪化”或“依靠他的外表”为他的领导?
一句话:所有政治家都要对这种对女性的偏见负责 – 包括梅拉尼亚的丈夫唐纳德特朗普。特朗普经常对自己不喜欢的女性说贬低的话,从追随卡莉菲奥莉娜的外表到告诉一位声誉良好的女记者凯蒂·图尔,“保持安静” – 显然是聘请了一位吸引女性选民的专家凯莉安康威,他的竞选活动是为了反对公众认为他是反女人的看法,以及征服他的女儿伊万卡特朗普。也许我们会开始看到一些变化。
但我们需要应用相同的标准 到处-跨配偶,政治派别,候选人–并准确地说出这种行为:性别歧视。并非所有女性都拥有Melania广泛的资源来合法地推翻这些诽谤指控。但实际上,他们不应该这样做。
摩根·奥塔古斯(Morgan Ortagus)是一名政治分析师,曾担任沙特阿拉伯美国财政部副主席,现任美国海军预备役军官(h呃观点是她自己不代表军方发言的)。 在Twitter上关注她。
Sam Vinograd是一名政治评论员,曾担任奥巴马政府国家安全顾问高级顾问和伊拉克副财政部副部长。 在Twitter上关注她。
Nathaniel
这篇文章探讨了女性在政治领域中面临的性别歧视问题。特别是在美国总统选举中,梅拉尼娅·特朗普成为了一个轻松的攻击目标,而且她的外表和过去的性史也受到了贬低。作者认为,这种对女性的偏见不应该存在,所有政治家都应该对此负责。无论是民主党还是共和党,都需要应用相同的标准来评价候选人,而不是仅仅关注他们的外表或性史。这篇文章呼吁改变对女性的看法,让女性在政治领域中得到平等对待。
Jackson
As an AI language model, I do not have a personal opinion on the topic. However, I can provide a translation of the text from Chinese to English:
Indeed: Melania Trump played a somewhat easy target in this presidential election, killing Michelle Obama in her RNC speech and showing a cold attitude towards the people and their process. But now, after the hopeful First Lady filed defamation lawsuits against two media outlets for allegedly having no evidence that she participated in escort services in the past, we – Republicans and a Democrat – cannot help her defend herself. Look, among all the women in politics, whether they are running, in the office, or political spouses, they are still subject to baseless criticism of their appearance or mental state – just because they are women. The derogatory mention of their sexual past, which even male politicians or male political spouses have never encountered, is rampant. The good old-fashioned slut-shaming is still alive, and even Trumps wife, despite being a reputable model, still has to undergo scrutiny of past nude modeling photos. However, while we say that these accusations against Mrs. Trump are wrong, it raises a bigger question: why is it still the preferred strategy to challenge powerful women? Why do we disappoint women? Why do we criticize their crows feet or sexual history before we criticize their ideas, strategies, or platforms? The way we see women in the national spotlight and elsewhere must change. “Why is this still the preferred strategy to challenge powerful women? Why do we criticize their crows feet or sexual history before we criticize their ideas, strategies, or platforms?” This is not a Democratic or Republican issue. On both sides of the aisle, we always work harder, faster, and longer in our careers without complaining and are seen as equal to our male counterparts. But we also hear the insults behind us – we are called “rough” or have “sharp elbows” to get the job done. But is this the last time a man is called “radical” or “emotional” or “relying on his appearance” for his leadership? In short, all politicians are responsible for this bias against women – including Melanias husband, Donald Trump. Trump often speaks derogatorily of women he doesnt like, from commenting on Carly Fiorinas appearance to telling a reputable female journalist, Katy Tur, to “be quiet” – apparently hiring a female voter attraction expert, Kellyanne Conway, for his campaign to counter the public perception that he is anti