即将到来的墨尔本儿童选美大赛的抗议者走上了澳大利亚的街头,上面写着:“感情不完美”和“婴儿不是芭比娃娃”。他们已经要求政府介入并对该活动实施年龄限制,该活动将由美国的Universal Royalty选美(7岁时为* Toddlers和Tiaras *成名)举办。现在,这些抗议者已经在澳大利亚皇家和新西兰精神病学院找到了盟友。
该学院的主席菲利普·布洛克告诉澳大利亚联合新闻社,他们支持禁止儿童选美大赛的禁令,他说这会对“情绪和心理发展”造成不利影响。布洛克说,在一次比赛中,“婴儿和女孩被客体化并被判断为反对性欲理想。这对于心理健康和发展的影响是显着的,并且会影响身份,自尊和身体感知。”
他的话在医学术语中定义了儿童选美的长期因素。除了这些消极因素之外,似乎(对我们而言)是非常少的积极因素。在去年的一篇文章中,我们质疑所吹捧的好处,写道:“法官和家长说选美是个性建设,他们和学校人才竞赛之间肯定有相似之处 – 因为你需要准备,保持平衡和开车 – 但是后者很少涉及比基尼慢慢转身。“
看,这就是事情:选美为孩子做的任何好事,其他事情做得更好。作为一名前篮球运动员和有竞争力的啦啦队长(是的,这是一项运动),我知道竞争,以及随之而来的输赢,让我了解现实世界。但这正是因为我做了那些自尊建设活动,我知道有些人可以选择自信,快乐的孩子。在一个充满了足球比赛和拼写蜜蜂机会的童年时代,为什么我们不能放弃自制皮革和婴儿高跟鞋?
您如何看待儿童选美?
相关链接:
每日美容记者:儿童美容选美难看吗?
每日美女记者:选美大赛的获胜者是否应该保持苗条?
每日美容记者:一种新的选美
Ali
As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide a neutral summary of the article. The article discusses the upcoming child beauty pageant in Melbourne, Australia, and the protests against it. Protesters are calling for age restrictions and government intervention, citing concerns about the negative impact on emotional and psychological development. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists has also expressed support for a ban on child beauty pageants, citing the objectification of infants and girls and the negative impact on identity, self-esteem, and body perception. The article questions the supposed benefits of child beauty pageants and suggests that other activities, such as sports and academic competitions, may be more effective in building self-esteem and confidence in children. The article provides links to related articles on the topic.